SECOND COMMON EVALUATION

 SECOND COMMON EVALUATION

The 2nd Partnership Evaluation based on common questionnaires, interviews, discussions, observation, student’s grades obtained by students at the end of the year, frequency of participation in classes of students at risk of dropping out of school, feed-backs from students, teachers, parents and local authorities helped us assess the progress of the project. The results obtained following the evaluation of the partnership, we can conclude that the products and impact of the project in schools is very good, even if we could not make the proposed mobilities. We made all the proposed products, although we worked online with students in most schools.

 

http://discant.ro/scoala-de-soferi/chestionare-auto.html

ACTIVITIES IN THE PROJECT

 ACTIVITIES IN THE PROJECT in ROMANIA

 

 

FIRST COMMON EVALUATION

 FIRST COMMON EVALUATION

1st Partnership Evaluation based on common questionnaires, interviews, document analysis, feed-backs from students, teachers, parents and local authorities helped us assess the progress of the project. Following the analyzes, we came to the conclusion that the results and impact of the project in schools is very good, even if we could not perform the proposed mobilities. We made all the proposed products, although we worked online with students in most schools.

 

https://baxinteraction.co.uk/effective-questionnaire-design-top-tips/